Thinking outside the box

Love this site's Today posts of images. Click the link to see the entire collection of Today images with the curator comments at the end.
Comments [0]
This article in full (not all that long) is worth a click. Bringing forward your different traits (working on them) could give you an edge in creating great Revolution stacks for yourself, co-workers, clients or market place.
Comments [0]

One of my favorite design sites. Great layout (of course), perfect mixture of books, links, and stories. A wonderful resource for all Revolution developers.
Comments [0]
Apple represents the “auteur model of innovation,” observes John Kao, a consultant to corporations and governments on innovation. In the auteur model, he said, there is a tight connection between the personality of the project leader and what is created. Movies created by powerful directors, he says, are clear examples, from Alfred Hitchcock’s “Vertigo” to James Cameron’s “Avatar.”
At Apple, there is a similar link between the ultimate design-team leader, Mr. Jobs, and the products. From computers to smartphones, Apple products are known for being stylish, powerful and pleasing to use. They are edited products that cut through complexity, by consciously leaving things out — not cramming every feature that came into an engineer’s head, an affliction known as “featuritis” that burdens so many technology products.
“A defining quality of Apple has been design restraint,” says Paul Saffo, a technology forecaster and consultant in Silicon Valley.
That restraint is evident in Mr. Jobs’s personal taste. His black turtleneck, beltless blue jeans and running shoes are a signature look. In his Palo Alto home years ago, he said that he preferred uncluttered, spare interiors and then explained the elegant craftsmanship of the simple wooden chairs in his living room, made by George Nakashima, the 20th-century furniture designer and father of the American craft movement.
Great products, according to Mr. Jobs, are triumphs of “taste.” And taste, he explains, is a byproduct of study, observation and being steeped in the culture of the past and present, of “trying to expose yourself to the best things humans have done and then bring those things into what you are doing.”
His is not a product-design philosophy steered by committee or determined by market research. The Jobs formula, say colleagues, relies heavily on tenacity, patience, belief and instinct. He gets deeply involved in hardware and software design choices, which await his personal nod or veto. Mr. Jobs, of course, is one member of a large team at Apple, even if he is the leader. Indeed, he has often described his role as a team leader. In choosing key members of his team, he looks for the multiplier factor of excellence. Truly outstanding designers, engineers and managers, he says, are not just 10 percent, 20 percent or 30 percent better than merely very good ones, but 10 times better. Their contributions, he adds, are the raw material of “aha” products, which make users rethink their notions of, say, a music player or cellphone.
“Real innovation in technology involves a leap ahead, anticipating needs that no one really knew they had and then delivering capabilities that redefine product categories,” said David B. Yoffie, a professor at the Harvard Business School. “That’s what Steve Jobs has done.”
Timing is essential to make such big steps ahead. Carver Mead, a leading computer scientist at the California Institute of Technology, once said, “Listen to the technology; find out what it’s telling you.”
Mr. Jobs is undeniably a gifted marketer and showman, but he is also a skilled listener to the technology. He calls this “tracking vectors in technology over time,” to judge when an intriguing innovation is ready for the marketplace. Technical progress, affordable pricing and consumer demand all must jell to produce a blockbuster product.
via nytimes.com
There's a bit more article there on the NYTimes link. The above auteur approach has been my approach as well, but I don't always execute on it as well as I'd like. I do get my head turned from time to time and have to reformulate my products.
Comments [0]
Some great design concepts for an eReader are brought forth here. Worth a watch. I especially like the "heat up the content" method of showing contextually appropriate admin tools.
Comments [0]
Apr 2nd in Web Roundups by Danny Outlaw
While many of us can create something that looks good in Photoshop or attractive when spliced into CSS, but do we actually understand the design theory behind what we create? Theory is the missing link for many un-trained but otherwise talented designers. Here are 50 excellent graphic design theory lessons to help you understand the 'Whys', not just the 'Hows'.
![]()
Typography
1. Typography, Part 1
"Good typography depends on the visual contrast between one font and another, and the contrast between text blocks and the surrounding empty space."
Visit Lesson
This article will take away any excuse you had to do poorly designed Revolution apps.
Comments [0]
Comments [0]
I've been a big fan of inline calendars for date entry. I also like allowing the user to do in a couple keystrokes, too, but this one by 37signals in Basecamp is really nice.
It would not be difficult to do this in Revolution with the new graphic effects in your property inspector.
Comments [0]
"The idea for Litl really came watching my family use computers around the house," says CEO John Chuang, a serial entrepreneur best known for founding and selling Aquent (aka MacTemps). People aren't after hardware; they're after content, and that content lives on the web. The best home computer, therefore, is one that comes closest to completely disappearing. Based upon that insight, Chuang took almost three years to develop the Litl, which begins shipping this week for $699.
Your typical computer is performance oriented--when's the last time you saw Dell or HP advertising a computer's user interface (which is ruled by Microsoft anyhow), rather than the processor speed or screen inches? The Litl is designed around how people actually use their computers in the home. As such, it's not really a laptop or a netbook or even a smart TV. It's a hybrid unto itself.
The computer they produced has no hard-drive--the idea is that you don't need one, since your average at-home computer user just needs web access for getting at their content. The OS, therefore, is dead simple, and utterly devoid of clutter--web pages each get a "card," which you can click on to enlarge. The case, meanwhile, is suited to calling up content, and then sitting back to consume it: There's a traditional laptop mode, and then it flips over to an "easel" mode, suited to passive viewing. If you need a bigger screen, the device has an HDMI jack, for connecting to your TV.
On paper, the Litl may not look like much--your typical netbook is similarly powered, works offline, has a hard drive, and is $200 cheaper. But Litl isn't selling hardware specs; they're selling a stone-cold brilliant design. And to appreciate it, you have to be able to play with the device.
But for now, Litl is only being sold online. And therein lies the problem. Without handling it, you'll never appreciate the thoroughness of the design language--the scroll wheel on the laptop, echoed in the scroll wheel of the remote; the perfectly weighted hinge which doubles as a handle and hides the battery; the sturdiness of the case; the brightness of the screen; the way the packaging and branding looks domestic but not quite feminine; or even the fact that when the power pack is plugged in, a tiny, embedded LED illuminates the dot of the '"i" in "Litl".
The computer really does disappear in easel mode--you can barely see the keyboard behind, because of the black and white color contrasts of the case. All while occupying a tiny footprint, meaning that you can set it down on a nightstand, a couch, or a kitchen counter.
It all amounts to a massive gamble: Sure, computers should be better suited to how we actually use them. Litl shows they can be. But will people really appreciate the problems it solves? Or are they content with making due? The venture is self-funded. Chuang hasn't brought in venture capitalists. He wants the company to be able to tolerate risk in a way that investors would not.
As for sales, Chuang argues that if users finally get their hands on the Litl, they'll appreciate what lies behind the premium price. Meanwhile, the company is also backing up the device with a two-year money-back guarantee, on the idea that seeing is believing. And if that still doesn't convince people? James Gardner, Litl's chief marketer, offers the hard sell: "How much is it worth to you, to never have to fix your mother-in-law's computer?"
via fastcompany.com
Watching this video you realize how many vestigial elements persist on our hardware: caps lock, function keys...to name a couple. This little gem is an Intriguing concept, but not without its marketing challenges.
BTW, here is the web site for the litl: http://litl.com/
How someone can write a story like this and NOT include a URL to the product is astounding to me.
After looking at about 12 pages on the site, I came upon this page. It's a very thought-provoking piece about the decisions that the developers of litl made regarding the OS, hardware and business—and why they made them. The best part of the site for would-be Rev developers, designers and entrepreneurs.
Comments [0]
Comments [0]